Ear & Hearing

Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by stimulating auditory neurons to encode amplitude envelopes across frequency bands, providing essential cues for speech recognition. This study investigated how stimulation pulse rate constrains temporal envelope processing and speech cue perception in ten post-lingually deaf CI users by evaluating amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds and consonant identification performance across pulse rates. The effects of pulse rate on temporal processing and speech perception were examined using both standard clinical multi-channel strategies and single-channel strategies designed to isolate within-channel envelope representations. Results revealed a significant decline in AM detection and consonant recognition performance at the lowest tested pulse rate of 125 pulses per second (pps), consistent with perceptual constraints on temporal processing at low carrier rates, rather than inadequate envelope sampling. At the highest pulse rate of 4000pps, a non-significant reduction in AM detection was observed which may be consistent with previously reported reductions in amplitude discrimination at high pulse rates. Consonant recognition performance remained stable across clinically relevant pulse rates (250-2000pps), though listener-specific pulse rate effects were observed. Notably, significant correlations were found between single-channel and multi-channel performance in AM detection and consonant recognition tasks. These findings support an important contribution of within-electrode temporal envelope processing to multi-channel speech perception and highlight the clinical relevance of individual variability in pulse rate effects.

Acoustic cues such as pitch and spatial location allow listeners to attend to a target speaker and ignore competing talkers, aiding speech recognition in background noise. Diminished ability to utilize acoustic cues for speech stream segregation may thus contribute to older adults' challenges hearing in noise. Adults aged 18-74 completed a speech-in-speech identification task with three conditions containing 1) only pitch cues (fundamental frequency), 2) only spatial cues (interaural time differences; ITDs), and 3) both pitch and spatial cues for segregating a target talker from competing talkers. Hearing thresholds at standard and extended high frequencies (EHFs), auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), and digit span scores were acquired to examine the influence of sensory and cognitive factors on use of each acoustic cue for speech-in-speech recognition. Significant differences were observed between cue condition scores indicating that use of the available cue(s) drove performance. ABR metrics were not a significant predictor but digit span scores significantly predicted scores on all three cue conditions. Working memory abilities therefore set a baseline for participants' speech-in-speech recognition regardless of the acoustic content. Hearing thresholds at standard frequencies significantly predicted scores on the Pitch condition. EHF hearing thresholds better predicted Spatial and Both Cue condition performance, suggesting that EHF thresholds represent auditory processing important for coding ITDs. Age group analysis revealed that older adults (aged 40+) performed significantly more poorly on all cue conditions of the speech-in-speech recognition task relative to younger adults. Age-related changes in auditory sensory processing may therefore impair older adults' speech-in-noise perception by reducing their ability to use acoustic cues for segregating target and competing speech.

The availability of hearing aids that can connect wirelessly to smartphone technologies via Bluetooth has grown exponentially in recent years. However, there is limited evidence assessing the benefits of user-adjustability afforded by these devices. This study aimed to assess the benefits of smartphone-connected hearing aids and an accompanying application (or app) in new and existing hearing aid users. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 44 adult hearing aid users (14 new and 30 existing) were recruited. Participants were fitted bilaterally with smartphone-connected hearing aids that could be adjusted by the user via an app. Self-reported outcome measures were collected at fitting and after seven-weeks of using the device in everyday life. For both new and existing hearing aid users, significant improvements in social participation, hearing-related fatigue, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction were found. For existing hearing aid users, all outcomes were significantly better for the smartphone-connected hearing aids plus app in comparison to their existing hearing aids that did not connect to a smartphone, all with moderate-to-large clinical effect sizes (d> .6). User-controllability via the app was identified as the key benefit, and most participants (68%) reported that the app met their needs 'extremely' or 'very well'. These results suggest that, when used in conjunction with an app, smartphone-connected hearing aids can improve hearing outcomes due to greater user-controllability to improve listening. Thus, smartphone-connected hearing aids have the potential to facilitate patient-centred care, empowering the individual to successfully manage their hearing loss.

Studies employing and evaluating hearing-aid self-adjustments frequently label the resulting settings as 'preferences' without questioning that label. There is a lack of inquiries into the rationale behind participants' choices or their approach to self-adjustment. We here employed a think-aloud protocol concurrent with individuals' self-adjustments to capture qualitative perspectives on these processes. Thirty-six adult hearing-aid users were asked to verbalise what they were thinking while adjusting to their preference three stimuli (music, speech or speech in noise) using three control interfaces (1 slider jointly controlling bass/treble, 2 sliders separately controlling bass and treble or 3 sliders controlling bass, mid and treble). Audio-video recordings were transcribed, annotated and analysed using inductive content coding and thematic analysis. Participants' approach and navigation of the self-adjustment process was best defined as a continuum between exploratory and anticipatory archetypes, with both types sometimes occurring at different stages within the same adjustment. The exploratory type initially assesses control functions, then selects the optimal setting from available options, and evaluates sound changes affectively in isolation or comparatively against prior settings. The anticipatory type begins by evaluating the sound, identifying issues, adjusting settings guided by past experiences, and evaluating adjustments against the identified issues. Additionally, the descriptors elicited during adjustments generally agreed with expert-based data. The resulting qualitative framework of self-adjustment helps explain both how hearing-aid users navigate the personalisation process and how self-adjustment can promote greater understanding of the options available and greater ownership in that process.

Introduction Deafness is the most common human sensory deficit. Cochlear implantation is the primary intervention for severe-to-profound deafness. Currently, over 7000 people have bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) in the United Kingdom (UK), most of whom are children. Patient feedback suggests that for children with bilateral CIs, everyday communication is challenging and tiring, with extra effort required to integrate information from two ears, especially in noise, and that current rehabilitation techniques are not engaging, or appropriate to their lifestyles. To address these issues, researchers developed the Both EARS (BEARS) training package comprised of three virtual reality games to improve sound localization and listening in noise. Objectives This protocol describes the design and methodology of a multi-center phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether use of the BEARS training package alongside usual care compared to only receiving usual care improves speech-in-noise perception, hearing experiences, vocabulary and quality of life and reduces listening effort in children and young people (aged 8 -16 years (inclusive) with bilateral CIs. Methods This RCT is currently underway in 16 clinical CI departments in National Health Service or university hospitals across the UK. The intervention involves 3 months of spatial-listening training delivered via the BEARS training package in addition to any routine rehabilitation. The control is usual care (routine rehabilitation clinical care pathway). The primary outcome is the difference between the intervention groups in speech-in-noise perception score at 3 months derived from the spatial speech in noise (SSiN-VA) test. Recruitment closes at the end of the day on 31st July 2026, and end of data collection is 31st October 2026. Data analyses will be reported by 31st March 2026. Significance This is the largest known trial of children and young people with bilateral CIs. It will generate high-quality evidence on speech-in-noise outcomes and inform training interventions to improve spatial listening. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05808543; UKs clinical study registry (ISRCTN92454702)

In conventional hearing-aid personalisation, clinicians cannot hear what their patients hear, and patients cannot often reliably detect or describe what they hear. Self-adjustment avoids this issue but requires user controls that adjust hearing-aid signal processing parameters to be effective, efficient and easy. In this study, we explored (a) the roles of interface complexity and stimulus type in the self-adjustment of hearing-aid gain, and (b) how well individuals can adjust one sound to match another to assess the same interfaces and stimuli. Adult hearing-aid users with mild to moderate symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss repeatedly adjusted the gain (a) to their preference from individual prescription (n = 41) and (b) to match their previous preferences from a random starting point (n = 32) using three interfaces representing different bass/mid/treble configurations and three stimuli (music, speech and speech-in-noise). The large interindividual variability in self-adjusted gains clustered into three patterns of deviation from initial prescription: increased relative bass, overall gain reduction, and close to initial prescription. There were no substantial effects of interface nor stimulus on self-adjustment reliability (median {sigma} = 2.8 dB), whereas absolute sound-matching error increased with increasing interface complexity and centre frequency. Neither individual matching accuracy nor questionnaire responses predicted either self-adjusted gains or reliability. Overall, these results show that many - but not all - hearing-aid users can adjust gains with reasonable reliability, and while it can be difficult to predict the behaviour from the individual, the individual applies a similar self-adjustment behaviour across different interfaces and stimuli.

Objective: Impaired understanding of noisy or degraded speech is a central feature of listening difficulties (LiD), but the possible causes of these symptoms are wide-ranging. Accordingly, recent research underscores the need to study these deficits using a test battery approach. Event-related potentials are useful objective metrics for studying LiD, but probing function across the speech processing hierarchy using traditional protocols is sequential and unrealistic in clinical settings. The novel chirped speech (Cheech) method combines natural speech with acoustic chirps to overcome these limitations. This study examines its utility for profiling childhood LiD. Methods: Twenty-eight children (15 typically developing, 13 with LiD), aged 8-17 years old, listened to a 17-minute Cheech story and detected a target word within the story via button press while EEG data were collected from 53 scalp sites. Results: Cheech successfully evoked responses from the auditory brainstem response through to the brain's language centers, as reflected by the N400 effect. Unlike TD children, those with LiD demonstrated N400 effects with atypical distributions that favored frontal rather than the typical parietal sites. A trend towards a delayed and reduced amplitude Wave V was also observed. Conclusions: Hierarchical examination of speech processing using Cheech primarily implicates altered language processing as a contributing factor to LiD, with the frontal topography of the N400 effect for those with LiD potentially suggesting a greater reliance on deliberate memory retrieval during the speech perception task. Significance: LiD could arise due to auditory and/or cognitive factors. The present results demonstrate the feasibility of objective, parallel measurement across this hierarchy and point to impaired language processing as a possible mechanism.

BackgroundHearing aids and cochlear implants (CIs) are the primary interventions for sensorineural hearing loss, restoring auditory function through amplification and intracochlear electrical stimulation, respectively. For those with residual low-frequency hearing, the combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) has demonstrated superior speech perception, particularly in noisy environments, compared to either modality. However, CI surgery carries inherent risks, including postoperative hearing loss, which undermines EAS benefits and limits future rehabilitation options. To overcome these limitations, we propose a non-invasive alternative: extracochlear electric and acoustic stimulation (EEAS), delivering electrical stimulation via transcutaneous electrodes without surgery. Here, we present a first systematic investigation of non-invasive extracochlear electrical stimulation using ear canal electrode montages, evaluating its feasibility, perceptual effects, and key parameters across diverse hearing statuses. MethodsWe conducted a controlled, within-subject study with 15 participants: 5 with normal hearing (NH), 5 with high-frequency hearing loss (HI), and 5 with severe-to-profound deafness (PL). We used charge-balanced sinusoidal stimuli (125-4000 Hz) applied via an ear canal electrode and four return electrode montages, including contralateral ear canal, contralateral mastoid, ipsilateral mastoid, and forehead electrodes. Participants rated auditory sensations, including loudness, sound quality, and lateralization, as well as side effects on separate 0-10 scales, with current intensity increased up to 2 mA/cm{superscript 2}. Thresholds and perceptual responses were analyzed across frequencies, electrode configurations, and hearing groups. ResultsReliable auditory percepts were elicited across all groups. NH participants reported pure-tone sensations, whereas HI and PL participants perceived broadband, noise-like sounds. Loudness decreased with increasing frequency, particularly for HI and PL, with minimal responses in the high-frequency range. The current threshold increased with stimulation frequency, whereas the threshold expressed as charge per phase remained constant, suggesting that charge per phase primarily determines neural activation, whereas current amplitude is more closely associated with the intensity of auditory and side effect perception. Contralateral montages produced significantly higher loudness ratings than ipsilateral or forehead configurations. The forehead montage was poorly tolerated, leading to early termination due to discomforting side effects. Sound lateralization was predominantly central or bilateral with contralateral setups, while ipsilateral and forehead configurations yielded ipsilateral perceptions. ConclusionsNon-invasive extracochlear electrical stimulation via ear canal electrodes is feasible and perceptually effective across a spectrum of hearing statuses. Perceptive outcomes are strongly influenced by electrode montage and residual hearing, with evidence of electrophonic excitation in NH individuals and electroneural activation in HI and PL participants. Contralateral mastoid electrode configurations offer the optimal balance of perceptual strength, tolerability, and spatial localization. These findings establish a critical foundation for the development of EEAS devices, demonstrating that non-invasive electrical stimulation can generate meaningful auditory percepts, paving the way for safe, accessible, and integrated hearing rehabilitation solutions. This work informs future EEAS developments and advances the path toward clinically viable, non-invasive cochlear stimulation.

ObjectivesOutcomes following cochlear implantation vary substantially across adult recipients, and the cognitive and perceptual factors contributing to this variability are not fully understood. This poses a challenge for developing strategies to improve cochlear implant outcomes, as such approaches require a clearer understanding of the mechanisms underlying individual listening difficulties. In this study, we investigated auditory cognitive measures in cochlear implant (CI) users to further elucidate the origins of this variability. DesignThirty-seven adult cochlear implant users completed measures of auditory cognition, comprising auditory working memory (AWM) and sound segregation ability, measured using an auditory figure-ground task (AFG), as well as measures of peripheral temporal and spectral processing, comprising the temporal modulation detection threshold (TMDT) and spectral ripple discrimination threshold (SRDT). Speech perception outcomes were assessed using word-in-noise (WIN) and sentence-in-noise (SIN) tasks. Separate multiple linear regression models evaluated the unique contribution of the auditory cognition measures to WIN and SIN performance, after accounting for the peripheral measures. ResultsBoth regression models explained a substantial proportion of variance in speech-in-noise outcomes (WIN: adjusted R{superscript 2} = 0.55; SIN: adjusted R{superscript 2}=0.57, both p < 0.001). For WIN performance, AFG and AWM were significant predictors. A similar pattern was found for SIN performance, where lower AWM ability and poorer AFG segregation were linked to poorer sentence listening in noise. No significant effects of spectral ripple discrimination or temporal modulation detection were observed in either model, even though both were significantly correlated with WIN performance. ConclusionsThese findings indicate that auditory working memory and sound segregation ability are robust predictors of speech-in-noise outcomes in adult cochlear implant users, across both word- and sentence-level measures. Together, the results may help explain why speech-in-noise outcomes remain highly variable among CI users, even when basic sensory encoding abilities are taken into account. Incorporating measures of auditory working memory and fundamental sound segregation may therefore improve outcome prediction and help in developing more individualised rehabilitation strategies.

Children and adolescents with hearing loss frequently encounter reduced auditory access and delayed language development, factors that may influence the maturation of executive functions. This study examined developmental differences in planning, a core executive function, in 98 children and adolescents with hearing loss or normal hearing aged 7 to18 years using the Tower of London task. Compared to normal hearing peers, participants with hearing loss made more unnecessary moves and rule violations and initiated problem-solving more rapidly, suggesting reduced preplanning efficiency and increased impulsivity. These group differences were most pronounced in adolescents, who showed faster initiation and greater movement inefficiency than age-matched normal hearing participants. Within the hearing loss group, adolescents displayed higher accuracy and longer initiation times than children, reflecting developmental improvements despite persistent gaps relative to hearing peers. Language development age did not alter the main effects. Findings indicate that reduced early auditory and language access may contribute to differences in planning development, highlighting the need for targeted executive functions support in educational and clinical settings for youth with hearing loss.

Difficulties understanding speech in noise remain a common complaint even among listeners with normal hearing sensitivity, highlighting the need for objective, more effective measures of real-world listening. The goal of this study was to validate the use of a novel, chirped-speech (Cheech) stimulus - continuous, naturally-spoken speech fused with chirps designed to elicit robust auditory evoked potentials - to characterize relationships between speech recognition, listening effort, and auditory neural encoding. Twenty-five normal-hearing adults completed a sentence-recognition task using both original (unmodified) and Cheech-modified AzBio sentence lists in quiet, +3 dB, and -3 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions while neural responses from the brainstem through cortex were recorded simultaneously. Speech recognition remained near ceiling in quiet but declined with decreasing SNR for both original and Cheech stimuli. Compared with clean speech, Cheech-modified speech showed slightly poorer recognition performance as SNR decreased and somewhat higher perceived effort overall. Yet, Cheech was highly effective at evoking auditory responses from the brainstem (auditory brainstem response, ABR) through the cortex (including middle- and late-latency responses, MLR and LLR) even with <5 minutes listening time per condition. Neural responses showed reduced amplitudes and prolonged latencies as SNR decreased. In general, ABR latencies and wave I amplitudes were associated with speech-in-noise recognition performance, whereas cortical responses (MLR Na, Nb, and LLR P1) were associated with subjective workload. These findings show that Cheech-modified speech preserves intelligibility while yielding robust, multilevel neural recordings during sentence perception, offering a promising approach to examine hierarchical auditory processing under ecologically relevant speech-in-noise conditions.

Introduction We are currently working on the BEARS (Both Ears) virtual reality (VR) Randomised Controlled Trial. We are recruiting 272 deaf children and young people who use bilateral (both ears) cochlear implants (CI) to examine if using the BEARS VR games helps their hearing in background noise and ultimately their quality of life. Clinical trial participants should be representative of the population with the health condition, although this is rarely achieved in practice as people from ethnic minorities or those from more deprived areas may face barriers to participation. Study Design Mixed methods design Objectives Use a literature review and collection of data from cochlear implant centres to establish the sociodemographic characteristics of deaf children aged 8 to 16 years with bilateral cochlear implants in the United Kingdom (UK). a. Establish the sociodemographic characteristics of the families recruited to the BEARS clinical trial in the first six months, and compare with the age-matched population of deaf children with bilateral cochlear implants in the UK. b. Analyse the BEARS clinical trial pre-screening diversity data. c. Implement an established recruitment intervention method in a workshop to explore and optimise recruitment number and diversity. d. Compare the final six months of recruitment data diversity with the initial six months. Use interviews and focus groups to collect qualitative data from children and their families who chose not to take part in BEARS, clinicians, and family representatives (e.g. teachers) to explore barriers and facilitators to families taking part in BEARS. Amend the BEARS scale-up plan based on new learning. Methods Literature and scoping reviews, quantitative analysis of BEARS recruitment data, in-depth interviews, paired interviews, focus groups Sample size Qualitative sample: 10-15 children aged 8-16 with bilateral CI, 10-15 parents/carers of children with bilateral CI, 10-12 clinicians and 10-12 family representatives. Significance This work will evaluate how diverse the BEARS clinical trial recruitment is and whether it is representative of the UK population of children with bilateral cochlear implants. We will investigate recruitment barriers and implement measures to try to improve recruitment diversity.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, engagement, and usability of Tune Out, an unguided, self-paced online tinnitus management program, for reducing tinnitus severity in adults with tinnitus. Design: A two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial was conducted with Australian adults reporting diagnosed or self-reported tinnitus. Participants were randomised to immediate access to Tune Out or a waitlist control group. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was tinnitus severity measured using the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Secondary outcomes included tinnitus handicap, psychological symptoms, program engagement, self-efficacy, and usability. Results: Eighty-eight participants were randomised: 43 to the intervention group and 45 to the waitlist control group. The primary outcome analysis included 63 participants at 12 weeks. A significant Group x Time interaction was observed for TFI total score, indicating greater reductions in tinnitus severity over time in the intervention group compared with waitlist control, F(2, 102.57) = 5.95, p = .004, partial 2= .104. Significant effects were also observed for tinnitus handicap, F(2, 106.76) = 4.12, p = .019, partial 2 = .072. Effects on psychological symptoms were less consistent, although anxiety showed a significant Group x Time interaction, F(2, 116.85) = 3.63, p = .030, partial 2 = .059. At 12 weeks, 23.1% of intervention participants achieved a clinically meaningful reduction in tinnitus severity compared with 5.4% of controls. Program use was highly variable, with a median use of 1.10 hours, and 25.6% of intervention participants recording no use. Usability ratings were favourable among respondents, with a mean System Usability Scale score of 73.13. Conclusions: Tune Out demonstrated preliminary efficacy for reducing tinnitus severity and tinnitus handicap compared with waitlist control. Effects on broader psychological symptoms were less consistent. Although usability was rated positively, low and variable engagement highlights the need for strategies to support uptake and sustained use in unguided digital tinnitus interventions.

Several types of cues contribute to speech recognition in multi-talker environments. In this study, we investigated how talker head-orientation related (THOR) cues and extended high- frequency (EHF; >8kHz) cues affect speech-in-speech recognition for both female and male speech. We examined the THOR benefit associated with a non-facing masker talker head orientation (relative to a facing orientation) as a function of masker talker facing angle. The target talker always faced the listener, whereas co-located maskers were tested with eight different masker head angles, ranging from 0{degrees} (facing the listener) to facing 180{degrees} away. Two filtering conditions were tested: full- band and low-pass filtered at 8 kHz. A THOR benefit was observed at masker head angles greater than 45{degrees}, increasing from 2 dB to 8 dB between angles of 67.5{degrees} and 180{degrees}. This benefit was reduced for low-pass filtered speech. Access to EHF cues improved performance, but only for masker head angles >22.5{degrees}. There was no significant relationship between 16-kHz pure-tone thresholds and performance for young, normal-hearing listeners with good EHF hearing. These findings indicate that listeners benefit from non-facing masker talker head orientations >45{degrees} when the target talker is facing the listener, with greater benefit for larger head angles.

Humans often communicate and learn in noisy, complex listening environments. Here, we investigated the effects of spatial hearing and semantic context cues on speech intelligibility and listening effort in young adults with typical hearing. The listening task included conditions in which target speech and speech maskers were either spatially co-located or separated. Target sentences were either semantically coherent or anomalous, while the masker comprised a mixture of two coherent sentences. Results showed higher speech intelligibility in spatially separated than co-located conditions, demonstrating a robust spatial release from masking (SRM), which is consistent with prior findings. SRM did not differ between semantically coherent and anomalous sentences, indicating comparable benefits of spatial cues across semantic contexts. However, within each spatial configuration, intelligibility was higher for coherent than anomalous sentences. Listening effort, indexed by peak pupil dilation in pupillometry measurement, was reduced in spatially separated conditions, suggesting a trend toward a release from listening effort. Analysis of the timing of peak pupil dilation revealed a significantly delayed peak dilation for anomalous sentences in the co-located condition compared with coherent sentences in the separated condition, indicating increased processing demands in the absence of spatial and semantic cues. Finally, SRM was correlated with the magnitude of release from listening effort for coherent sentences, but not for anomalous sentences, suggesting that intelligibility and listening effort benefits might co-occur when contextual cues are available.

Objective: This study investigated whether plosive consonants carry a perceptual loudness weighting that significantly exceeds that of non-plosive consonants when judged by hearing-impaired listeners. Design: A prospective loudness matching experiment utilizing the method of adjustment. Study Sample: 19 consenting native English speakers (Mean age: 61.4, SD: 16.4) with bilateral mild to moderate high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, indicative of presbycusis. Stimuli: 13 vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) nonsense syllables, exclusively utilizing the flanking vowel /u/. Results: Descriptive analysis revealed a strong time-order effect influencing loudness judgments for 7 of the 13 VCV test stimuli. Statistical testing showed no significant didference (P = 0.94) between the relative amplitudes corresponding to the point of equal loudness for plosive-containing versus non-plosive-containing VCV stimuli. However, 6 individual VCV stimuli, containing consonants from 4 separate manners of articulation, produced significant loudness matching data (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The results falsify the hypothesis that plosives, analyzed collectively as a class, possess a heavier perceptual loudness weighting than non-plosive consonants. While 6 individual VCV stimuli indicated potential individual consonantal loudness weightings, these findings must be interpreted cautiously due to the restriction to a single vowel context and the presence of procedural time-order biases.

Background: Childhood and adolescent hearing loss affects not only communication and cognitive development but also motor skills and school participation. Consequently, it generates inequalities in learning and educational inclusion. Nevertheless, no systematic review has yet analyzed these differences from an inclusive education perspective. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Observational studies comparing physical fitness between children and adolescents with hearing loss and their hearing peers were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle--Ottawa Scale, and standardized effect sizes were calculated with a random-effects model. Results: Five studies (n=404) were analyzed. Findings revealed significant differences in strength, agility, speed, and balance. Moreover, the meta-analysis showed a large standardized effect favoring hearing children (ES=-2.35; 95% CI: -3.34 to -1.37). Conclusions: Children and adolescents with hearing loss present significantly lower physical fitness, which may affect the planning of physical education activities if their capacities are misinterpreted. Implementing inclusive and adapted strategies within the school curriculum is essential to ensure equal opportunities, improve physical fitness, and promote educational equity.

Introduction Hearing loss (HL) affects over 1{middle dot}5 billion people globally and India shares a disproportionately high burden including Disabling Hearing Loss (DHL). HL affects an Individual socio-economically, but there are limited studies on the broader societal economic consequences of HL in India.Methods Using Cost-of-Illness (COI) approach, we studied the societal economic burden of HL in India. This study uses epidemiological and macroeconomic data and modelling to estimate the loss of Gross National Income (GNI) due to HL and DHL across three economic pathways. Uncertainty is evaluated using deterministic and Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA).Results The model estimates that there are in India, 289 million and 85{middle dot}9 million people with HL and DHL respectively. Direct Loss of GNI and Indirect Loss of GNI (Caregiver burden) are estimated as INR 4,648{middle dot}4 billion (USD 55{middle dot}6 billion) and INR 3,268 billion (USD 39 billion) respectively. The Loss of GNI due to Low Education amongst those with HL is estimated as INR 1,041{middle dot}9 billion (USD 12{middle dot}45 billion).Discussion Economic burden of HL is presented across three pathways with Direct Loss of GNI due to DHL being the greatest. It also presents age stratified caregiver economic burden. The findings of the study help in estimating similar cost pathways, advocacy, and policy decisions towards reducing HL prevalence in India and LMICs. This study also highlights the need for India specific estimations related to the HL attributable low education, state-wise disaggregates, and prevalence studies. Funding This study has not received any funding.

The inflammatory foreign body response that follows cochlear implantation produces intracochlear fibrosis, neo-ossification, and elevated electrode impedances that can compromise implant performance. Dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implants reduce this response, but the durability of their anti-inflammatory effect over long implantation intervals has not been established. Using a murine model of chronic cochlear implantation in CX3CR1+/eGFP Thy1+/eYFP dual-reporter mice, we compared dexamethasone-eluting and standard mouse cochlear implants at 224 and 336 days post-implantation. Density of CX3CR1+ macrophages, MHCII+CX3CR1+ antigen-presenting macrophages, -SMA+ fibrosis, and neo-ossification were quantified in the scala tympani, Rosenthal canal, and lateral wall of the basal turn. Standard implants produced persistent macrophage and antigen-presenting macrophage infiltration, accompanied by an -SMA+ fibrotic response and neo-ossification. Dexamethasone-eluting implants suppressed macrophage infiltration in all three regions out to 336 days and reduced fibrosis at 224 days. In the subset of cochleae with electrode array translocation, dexamethasone-eluting implants attenuated macrophage infiltration and confined the fibrotic and osseous response to the site of translocation, whereas standard implants produced a widespread response. A reduction in immune cell density was also observed in the contralateral, unimplanted cochleae of animals implanted with dexamethasone-eluting implants, suggesting a wider component to the drug's effect. Dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implants therefore provide sustained, long-term suppression of the cochlear foreign body response in mice, supporting their continued translation toward clinical application. This effect was associated with continued low-level dexamethasone elution out to 336 days post-implantation; further work is needed to assess the durability of this effect at the conclusion of drug elution.

Auditory confounds have proven to be a major hurdle in the elucidation of veridical neuromodulation effects with transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS). Auditory noise masks are an essential method to reduce the audibility of TUS and have shown promise in several studies. Here we describe a novel approach for design, calibration, and psychometric validation of auditory noise masks to reduce the perceptibility of TUS. White noise masks and spectrum-tuned masks matched to a TUS protocol that generates highly salient auditory costimulation (487.5 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 10% duty cycle, 68 W/cm2 pulse-peak average intensity, 500 kHz acoustic frequency) were generated, and dB(A) levels were calibrated with an artificial ear. The masker levels needed to reduce TUS detection performance in a two-interval forced choice task were determined with an adaptive QUEST+ staircase in 20 neurotypical participants. Detection performance of this highly salient TUS protocol was driven to near chance performance (<55%) in 17/20 participants with white-noise and 18/20 participants with spectrum-tuned noise. However, high masker levels approaching safety limits were needed to render TUS inaudible for the majority of participants, indicating the need for formal masker calibration for these TUS settings. Additionally, against expectation the spectrum-tuned masker did not significantly outperform the white-noise masker, suggesting that perceptibility of TUS auditory costimulation does not lawfully follow the sound expected from its pulse envelope and the known spectrum of human hearing.